2014 ERP New Member Book

G UIDELINES FOR S TANDARD M ETHOD P ERFORMANCE R EQUIREMENTS

AOACO FFICIAL M ETHODS OF A NALYSIS (2012)

Appendix F, p. 2

of imprecision and computed as a relative standard deviation (RSD) of the test results. The imprecision of a method increases as the concentration of the analyte decreases. This table provides target RSDs for a range of analyte concentrations. Table A5: Expected Recovery as a Function of Analyte Concentration . Recovery is defined as the ratio of the observed mean test result to the truevalue.The rangeof the acceptablemean recovery expands as the concentration of the analyte decreases. This table provides target mean recovery ranges for analyte concentrations from 1 ppb to 100%. Table A6: Predicted Relative Standard Deviation of Reproducibility (PRSD R ) . This table provides the calculated PRSD R using theHorwitz formula: PRSD R = 2C –0.15 whereC is expressed as amass fraction. Table A7: POD and Number of Test Portions . This table provides the calculated probability of detection (POD) for given sample sizes and events (detections).Amethod developer can use this table to determine the number of analyses required to obtain a specificPOD. Informative annexes .—The SMPR Guidelines contain informative annexes on the topics of classificationofmethods, POD model,HorRat values, referencematerials, andmethodaccuracyand review.Aswith the informative tables, these annexes are intended to provideguidance and information to theworkinggroups. Initiationof anSMPR See Figure 1 for a schematic flowchart diagram of the SMPR development process.

policy. SMPRworkinggroups are expected to apply their expertise in the development of SMPRs. TableA1:PerformanceRequirements .Providesrecommended performance parameters to be included into an SMPR. Table A1 is organized by five method classifications: ( 1 ) main component quantitative methods; ( 2 ) trace or contaminant quantitative methods; ( 3 ) main component qualitative methods; ( 4 ) trace or contaminant quantitativemethods; and ( 5 ) identificationmethods. The table is designed to accommodate both microbiological and chemical methods. Alternate microbiological/chemical terms are provided for equivalent concepts. Table A2: Recommended Definitions . Provides definitions for standard terms in the SMPR Guidelines. AOAC relies on The International Vocabulary of Metrology Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM) and the International Organization for Standadization (ISO) for definition of terms not included inTableA2. TableA3:Recommendations forEvaluation .Providesgeneral guidance for evaluation of performance parameters.More detailed evaluation guidance can be found in Appendix D, Guidelines for Collaborative Study Procedures to Validate Characteristics of a Method of Analysis (2); Appendix I, Guidelines for Validation of Biological Threat Agent Methods and/or Procedures (3); Appendix K, AOAC Guidelines for Single-Laboratory Validation of ChemicalMethods forDietary Supplements andBotanicals (4); Codex Alimentarius Codex Procedure Manual (5); and ISO Standard 5725-1-1994 (6). TableA4: Expected Precision (Repeatability) as a Function of Analyte Concentration . The precision of a method is the closeness of agreement between independent test results obtained under stipulated conditions. Precision is usually expressed in terms

Figure 1. Schematicflowchart diagramof theSMPRdevelopment process.

©2012AOAC INTERNATIONAL