2017 Mid-Year Meeting Voting & ERP Panels
D. Proposal for Representative Voting Members To develop the proposal for voting members that is representative of the registrants for the SPADA meeting. There is a maximum of 25 seats possible; however, with the number of registrants, 25 voting seats may be more than is needed to represent the stakeholder panel. There are 23 registered organizations of which 12‐13 organizations would be appropriate to ensure that the perspectives are covered. For 13 representatives and using the Broad Perspectives of Registrants as a base, government is 70% of the registrants, and this would allow for nine (9) agencies. As industry is 22% of the registrants, this would allow for three (3) companies. With NGO being 4% percent of the registrants, this would allow for at least one organization. Region is not as much of an issue as it is all domestic with the heaviest concentration in the Washington, DC area (Washington, DC., Maryland, and Virginia).
RECOMMENDATION:
For the AOAC Official Methods Board to review and approved the recommended proposal in Table 2 for representative voting members for the SPADA meeting on Wednesday, March 15, 2017.
Table 2: Proposed Representative Voting Members Broad Perspective Specific Perspective
Region
Organization (s)
1. Government Military 2. Government Military 3. Government Military 4. Government Research 5. Government Research
US US US US US US US US US US US US
JPdM BDS
US ARMY MEDCOM USAMRIID
DoD ‐ DBPAO (Formerly Critical Reagents Program) Lawrence Livermore National Lab (Retired Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
6. Government Reference Standards 7. Government Coordination 8. Government Food Regulator
US NIST / Critical Reagents Program
US DHS OHA
US FDA
9. Government Methods
Medical Countermeasure Systems ‐ Diagnostics
10. Industry 11. Industry 12. Industry
Consulting
HADECO
Product Manufacturer US
Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems
Method Developer Reference Standard
Neogen
13. NGO
ATCC
Made with FlippingBook