AOAC ERP MICRO AUGUST 2018
OMAMAN-31 E: AOAC RI PTM Report 091501 ERP Use Only - March 2016
Table 10: 3M ™ MDA 2 - Salmonella Assay, Candidate vs. Reference – POD Results
Candidate
Reference
Analysis Time Point
MPN a / Test Portion
Matrix/Lot Number
N b
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD C
x c
d 95% CI
e
POD C
X
POD R
95% CI
Chicken Carcass Rinse: Lot 1
Naturally Contaminated 18 Hour N/A
20
9
0.45
0.26, 0.66
10
0.50
0.30, 0.70 -0.05
-0.33, 0.24
Candidate
Reference
Analysis Time Point
MPN a / Test Portion
Matrix/Lot Number
N b
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD C
x c
d 95% CI
e
POD C
X
POD R
95% CI
Chicken Carcass Rinse: Lot 2
Naturally Contaminated 18 Hour N/A
20
11
0.55
0.34, 0.74
7
0.35
0.18, 0.57 0.20
-0.10, 0.46
Candidate
Reference
Analysis Time Point
MPN a / Test Portion
Matrix/Lot Number
N b
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD C
x c
d 95% CI
e
POD C
X
POD R
95% CI
Chicken Carcass Sponge: Lot 1
Naturally Contaminated 18 Hour N/A
20
9
0.45
0.26, 0.66
8
0.40
0.22, 0.61 0.05
-0.24, 0.33
Candidate
Reference
Analysis Time Point
MPN a / Test Portion
Matrix/Lot Number
N b
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD C
x c
d 95% CI
e
POD C
X
POD R
95% CI
Chicken Carcass Sponge: Lot 2 a MPN = Most Probable Number is calculated using the LCF MPN calculator provided by AOAC RI, with 95% confidence interval b N = Number of test portions c x = Number of positive test portions d POD C = Candidate method confirmed positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials e POD R = Reference method confirmed positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials f dPOD C = Difference between the confirmed candidate method result and reference method confirmed result POD values g 95% CI = If the confidence interval of a dPOD does not contain zero, then the difference is statistically significant at the 5% level AOAC Research Institute Naturally Contaminated 18 Hour N/A 20 7 0.35 0.18, 0.57 8 0.40
0.22, 0.61 -0.05
-0.32, 0.23
Expert Review Panel Use Only
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog