AOAC ERP MICRO AUGUST 2018
OMAMAN-31 E: AOAC RI PTM Report 091501 ERP Use Only - March 2016
Table 18: 3M ™ MDA 2 - Salmonella Assay, Presumptive vs. Confirmed – POD Results
Analysis Time Point
Presumptive
Confirmed
MPN a / Test Portion N b
Matrix/Lot Number
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD CP
x c
d 95% CI
e 95% CI
POD CP
X
POD CC
Chicken Carcass Rinse: Lot 1
Naturally Contaminated 18 Hours N/A
20 9
0.45
0.26, 0.66
9
0.45
0.26, 0.66 0.00
-0.28, 0.28
Analysis Time Point
Presumptive
Confirmed
MPN a / Test Portion N b
Matrix/Lot Number
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD CP
x c
d 95% CI
e 95% CI
POD CP
X
POD CC
Chicken Carcass Rinse: Lot 2
Naturally Contaminated 18 Hours N/A
20 11
0.55
0.34, 0.74
11 0.55
0.34, 0.74 0.00
-0.28, 0.28
Analysis Time Point
Presumptive
Confirmed
MPN a / Test Portion N b
Matrix/Lot Number
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD CP
x c
d 95% CI
e 95% CI
POD CP
X
POD CC
Chicken Carcass Sponge: Lot 1
Naturally Contaminated 18 Hours N/A
20 9
0.45
0.26, 0.66
9
0.45
0.26, 0.66 0.00
-0.28, 0.28
Analysis Time Point
Presumptive
Confirmed
MPN a / Test Portion N b
Matrix/Lot Number Chicken Carcass Sponge: Lot 2 (25 g): Lot 2
f 95% CI g
Strain
dPOD CP
x c
d 95% CI
e 95% CI
POD CP
X
POD CC
20 7 AOAC Research Institute Expert Review Panel Use Only 0.35 0.18, 0.57 7 0.35 0.18, 0.57 0.00
Naturally Contaminated 18 Hours N/A
-0.28, 0.28
a MPN = Most Probable Number is calculated using the LCF MPN calculator provided by AOAC RI, with 95% confidence interval b N = Number of test portions c x = Number of positive test portions d POD CP = Candidate method presumptive positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials e POD CC = Candidate method confirmed positive outcomes divided by the total number of trials f dPOD CP = Difference between the candidate method presumptive result and candidate method confirmed result POD values g 95% CI = If the confidence interval of a dPOD does not contain zero, then the difference is statistically significant at the 5% level
Made with FlippingBook Learn more on our blog