AOAC Final Action Methods in 2018
Table 2014.09F. LC-MS/MS retention times, ion transitions, collision energies, LODs, and LOQs for the 20 pesticides of interest in this study
Quantifying precursor/ production transition, m / z 322.0/125.0 256.1/ 209.1 210.1/111.0 215.1/126.0 240.1/125.0 243.1/173.0 294.2/69.0 270.2/224.0 324.2/262.1 326.2/148.1 314.1/267 368.1/145.0 306.2/164.0 305.0/169.1 398.0/158.1 308.0/197.0 334.3/147.0 528.0/150.0 409.3/186.1 350.0/198.0 296.1/240.1
Qualifying precursor/ product ion transition, m / z 322.0/290.0 256.1/175.1 210.1/168.1 215.1/148.1 240.1/89.1 243.1/215.0 294.2/197.1 270.2/148.2 324.2/282.1 326.2/294.0 314.1/206.0 368.1/205.0 306.2/108.1 305.0/153.2 398.0/314.0 308.0/272.0 334.3/117.1 528.0/218.0 409.3/206.2 350.0/97.0 296.1/222.1
Collision energy, V Fragmentation, V
Retention time, min
No.
Pesticide
LOQ, μg/kg LOD, μg/kg
ISTD Chlorpyrifosmethyl
16.01
15; 15 10; 10
80 80 80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Imidacloprid
3.81 5.89 6.83
22.0 24.4
11.0 12.2
Propoxur
10; 5
Monolinuron Clomazone Ethoprophos Triadimefon Acetochlor
15; 10 20; 50 10; 10 20; 15
100 100 120 100
3.6 0.4 2.8 7.9
1.8 0.2 1.4 3.9
8.3
11.37 11.64 12.94 13.25 14.40 14.58 14.99 15.05 15.20 15, 45 16.60 16.82 16.76 16.82 17.65 17.98
5; 20
80
47.4
23.7
Flutolanil Benalaxyl
20; 10
120 120
1.1 1.2
0.6 0.6
15; 5
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Kresoxim-methyl
5; 5
80 80
100.6
50.3
Picoxystrobin
20; 5
8.4 0.2 0.7
4.2 0.1 0.4
Pirimiphos-methyl
20; 30 20; 20
120 160
Diazinon Bensulide Quinoxyfen Tebufenpyrad
20; 5
80
34.2
17.1 76.7
35; 35 25; 40 20; 20 15; 10 20; 35 10; 20
180 160 120 120 100 100
153.4
0.3 7.5 2.0
0.1 3.8 1.0
Indoxacarb
Trifloxystrobin Chlorpyrifos
53.8
26.9
Butralin
1.9
1.0
( 3 ) Load the rinse into the cartridge when the level of the loading solution in the cartridge reaches the top of the anhydrous sodium sulfate packing. ( 4 ) Connect a 30 mL reservoir onto the upper part of the cartridge using an adapter ( see Figure 2014.09 ). ( 5 ) Elute the cartridge with 25 mL acetonitrile–toluene (3 + 1, v/v). ( 6 ) Evaporate the eluate to approximately 0.5 mL using a rotary evaporator (or TurboVap) in a 40°C water bath. For GC-MS and/or GC-MS/MS analysis only: ( 7 ) Add 40 μL heptachlor epoxide (internal standard; ISTD) working standard solution to the sample in F ( b )( 6 ). ( 8 ) Evaporate to dryness under a stream of nitrogen in a 35°C water bath (or Turbo Vap).
( 9 ) Dissolve the dried residue in 1.5 mL hexane, ultrasonicate the samples to mix, and filter through a 0.2 μm membrane filter. The sample is ready for GC-MS or GC-MS/MS analysis. For LC-MS/MS analysis only: ( 10 ) Add 40 μL chlorpyrifos methyl (ISTD) working standard solution to the sample prepared in F ( b )( 6 ). ( 11 ) Evaporate to dryness under a stream of nitrogen in a 35°C water bath (or Turbo Vap). ( 12 ) Dissolve the dried residue in 1.5 mL acetonitrile–water (3 + 2, v/v), ultrasonicate the samples to mix, and filter through a 0.2 μm membrane filter. The sample is ready for LC-MS/MS analysis. G. Quantitative Analysis (a) Criteria for identification and confirmation .—( 1 ) Measure the retention time of the monitored peaks and match them with the same peaks in the pesticide standard chromatograms.
Table 2014.09G. SRM acquisition parameters by LC-MS/MS analysis for the 20 pesticides Group Start time, min Monitored ion transitions, m / z
Dwell time, ms
1
0
256.1/209.1, 256.1/175.1, 210.1/111.0, 210.1/168.1, 240.1/125.0, 240.1/89.1, 243.1/173.0, 243.1/215.0, 294.2/69.0, 294.2/197.1, 215.1/126.0, 215.1/148.1 270.2/224.0, 270.2/148.2, 306.2/164.0, 306.2/108.1, 324.2/262.1, 324.2/282.1, 326.2/148.1, 326.2/294.0, 305.0/169.1, 305.0/153.2, 314.1/267.0, 314.1/206.0, 322.0/125.0, 322.0/290.0, 368.1/145.0, 368.1/205.0, 398.0/158.1, 398.0/314.0 334.3/147.0, 334.3/117.1,528.0/150.0,528.0/218.0, 409.3/186.1, 409.3/206.2,296.1/240.1, 296.1/222.1, 350.0/198, 350.0/97.0, 308.0/197.0, 308.0/272.0
30
2
12
20
3
16.4
25
© 2018 AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Made with FlippingBook HTML5