AOAC RI ERP Final Action Recommendations eBook

The Statistic’s Advisor’s review was not available to this reviewer. An RLOD result was projected in the collaborative study protocol. It is not mentioned in this collaborative study manuscript. However, its absence is not critical. The demonstrated equivalence of the test method with the two reference methods is sufficient.

Reviewer 4 (Brodsky): None.

Reviewer 5 (Hammack): No comments.

Reviewer 6 (Hayes): N/A

Reviewer 7 (Fernandez): No

Reviewer 8 (Chen): No

Reviewer 9 (McMahon): N/A

h. Comments:

Reviewer 1 (Achen): None.

Reviewer 2 (Douey): In general, the studies were well done, with demonstration that the alternate BAX method would be considered equivalent to the reference methods used. Reviewer 3 (Hitchins): Fourteen laboratories out of 15 provided valid data on each matrix in the partial recovery region.

Reviewer 4 (Brodsky): None.

Reviewer 5 (Hammack): No comments.

Reviewer 6 (Hayes): N/A

Reviewer 7 (Fernandez):