AOAC SPIFAN Stakeholder Panel Meeting Book (September 7, 2019)

Method comparison in 2019 (outcome and next step) Outcome: • Gaps in GB from ISO/AOAC/IDF acknowledged and will be confirmed by data • Final conclusions from comparative study and proposal for revision will be submitted

to CFSA via CSIQ’s GB evaluation program • CFSA will appoint GB drafter for revision

Next steps • Continue with GB/international method comparison for methods with highest expected difference • Collect more methods from working groups of GB evaluation program

Method comparison in 2019 (next step)

The list for new GB’s to compare with international methods • phosphorus, iodine, nucleotides, fatty acids, vitamin A, vitamin E, vitamin C, and coliform count The topics were proposed by GB evaluation working groups based on expected difference between GB and international methods