Candidates for 2016 ERP of the Year

ERP PROFILE SUMMARIES

RECOMMENDATION: Do you recommend that the ERP adopt this method as an AOAC Official Methods of Analysis (First Action status) ? ER 1 NOT WITHOUT CORRECTIONS TO LANGUAGE! ER 2 Yes ER 3 yes ER 4 Recommend adoption as First Action Method Status ER 5 No, I believe more work needs to be done to assess this method around the Codex Gluten level in all of the selected matrices. ER 6 No ER 7 AFTER FIRST ACTION STATUS: Is there any additional information that the ERP should consider in order to recommend the method for Final Action status? ER 1 NA ER 2 There could be end-user issues with this kit. Unfortunately, with 3 out of 16 labs not able to complete the testing appropriately, there would appear to be a higher level of competence required to use this test kit. The Collaborative study has been completed and so it remains for AOAC to monitor and obtain feedback from method users for the next 2-year grace period. This method needs to be tested with proline specific protease because the target epitope for this monoclonal has two proline residues. ER 5 ER 3 ER 4 user feedback

ER 6 ER 7

NA

213