Expert Review Panel for Kombucha Tea
444 , ,.$ &
. , 9 69
9
9
ĎC`C zPC
ë < I ¥5 Þ ! ! ! ! ! ! Z ě ě F U æčě 7 ěZ Úĕě X 0- ě ě ě Ē 0 ěû ċ äČě 'ě 7 ě ' &ě - 7 & Cě Y,#t#N 2 V ¤ ně M ě ě ě +D $ ! ě+>ě% ! $ ě ě ( ěE * ě% 82 ě Ė 1 ė ě ] ě 0 Q ě# e ě3 -ě Î # 3 1 ]Hě sě 0ě ě pHě ' ěě ě 'ě Áě ě °õ J 2J:Ă Jěw . Ü 1 Z Ýě ě 7 ěÌ ě 'ě# iě ! 8 Kl 4 {8 ě ! ì ě % 9 £D $9f * ě 4%ě@ 9 j=©=K=+ě ě$ ? ě ě ; ě ( ě "ě k ě? ě ě ; ě ( ě ) ě y ( ě ) ě _ H ěN - ěÅ ^ ě4 ) ě ěM "ě BB ě "ě ě ) ě @ >ě * ě ćě ! ! ! Y,#, # N V ¦ «ě M ě ě +D $ ! ě+>ě% ! E ě ě ( ěE * ě% 82 ě iě ! {8 Kl $9f * ě 4%ě@ 9 j=+=m=měE ? ě ě ; ě ( ě "ě 2 ě? ě ě ; ě ( ě ) ě y ( ě ) ě ^ ě4 ) ě ěM "ě 1 #eeQ & ě Đě Ãně, 7 & ěp SS Ā âĘ ěr0 & ě' ě ] &_ 'ětñěåüě Ödě ě dě ě, 7 & ě' ě3 ß ě &ě ¼ Ĉ ě -Q \0 ' ± ÷à ě đě ¸¬ě¿
ě a ã sě
ě øGgěc.:ě µ. ěÂě Ó × . : 6 J ĉ çě Ê J a ēě w : . |G~ă : GgěË. Ï 6 ~6 T Gě ¶î6:6ØT: ěTdě|ěúcě6ěÇGTï.aě.cě² ù 6 Ĕ g 1 , S ěH ě 3 ě # ěr0 ě&_ ěX 0- ę ½ þ ě ³} Aě ÀĄě áÔA}ě¹ÙąôA BB ě "ě ě ) ě @ >ě * ě "ě Y,´ýó ¡# N2 V¨ ®ě X ě ě +D $ ! ě+>ě% ! ! ě$ ě ě ( ěE * ě iě ! 8 KD $9f * ě 4%ě@ 9 % 8k ě? ě ě ; ě ( ě ě É ;b ě ¾ bě· ò ě Í ê bě ě ^ ě4 ě ěº "ě BB ě "ě ě ) ě @ >ě * ě "ě " 2 ě? ě WªW§W¢ěÈÛöéí¯ÿð» $ ! ! ! ! ! 1 , 7 &ě[QU ě FĚĊě 3 S 1 \ ' āě[F U ě èě 3 - 1 \ ě [F U F ě 3H - 444 , ,.$ & *'09 -., 9!0! . % )9+01&121! 97-!.1 9!3'!4 9 +!) 9 ! 5! 9 9&1! 9!* !/9 9!0! . % )9+01&121! 9 9 9 0-7 %(!8 "9 " ! ! !# ! 9 9 ! . %9 !0(1,-9 (53 5(9,(:6 In your judgment, does the method sufficiently meet the Standard Method Performance Requirements (SMPR)? In your judgment is the method scientifically sound and can be followed? , In your judgment, what are the strengths and weaknesses of the method? In your judgment, how do the weaknesses weigh in your recommendation for the method? In your judgment, will the method serve well the stakeholder community that will use the method? In your judgment, what additional information may be f needed to urther support the method meeting the SMPR?
Made with FlippingBook