Review Book

14. Are the references complete and correctly annotated? If no, please explain. Reviewer 1 NO Web address or Journal details needed for reference # 1. Reviewer 2 YES Reviewer 3 YES Reviewer 4 NO 4-update OMA information to 2019, 21st edition Reviewer 5 YES 15. Does the method contain adequate safety precaution reference and/or statements? Reviewer 1 YES Reviewer 2 YES Reviewer 3 YES Reviewer 4 YES Reviewer 5 YES 16. Does the data from the collaborative study support the method as written? Reviewer 1 YES Reviewer 2 YES Reviewer 3 YES Reviewer 4 YES With the above corrections Reviewer 5 YES 17. Does the data collected support the criteria given in the collaborative study protocol? Reviewer 1 YES Reviewer 2 YES Reviewer 3 YES Reviewer 4 YES Reviewer 5 YES 18. Are there any concerns regarding the safety of the method? Please refer to the review provided by the Safety Advisor. Reviewer 1 NO Safety report not provided Reviewer 2 Report Pending Reviewer 3 NO Reviewer 4 See Safety Advisor review Reviewer 5 NO Safety Advisor SAFETY ADVISOR'S RECOMMENDATION:

A. The method contains appropriate precautions and potential hazards have been identified corresponding to the approved study protocol and safety guidance.