SPDS Lutein and Turmeric ERPs
General Information
Reviewer Name:
Hong You
Email:
hongyou@eurofinsus.com
Organization:
Method Reviewed:
LUT‐02
Method Title:
Determination of Lutein and Zeaxanthin Esters and Their Geometric Isomers in Carotenoid Ester Concentrates Used as Ingredients in Nutritional Supplements: Validation of a Combined Spectrophotometric‐HPLC Method
Applicable SMPR
2016.004
I. Summary
Summary of Method:
The combined spectrophotometric‐LC method was published in August 2016 at J AOAC and submitted to the ERP for SPDS Set 4 Ingredients in response to the call for methods. A three‐step procedure is used, involving (1) an HPLC chromatogram of the saponified sample to calculate the composite‐specific absorbance value based on its carotenoid profile and documented or estimated extinction coefficients (1%) of predominant geometrical isomers of lutein and zeaxanthin esters, (2) measurement of the optical absorbance of the unsaponified sample and calculation of its specific absorbance at 445 nm, and (3) calculation of the total carotenoid ester content of the sample. No calibration standards are needed for this protocol.
1. Does the Applicability of the Method Support the Applicability of the SMPR? If not, please explain what is missing. II. Review of the Method Only 2. Does the analytical technique(s) used in the method meet the SMPR? If not, please specify how it differs from what is stated in the SMPR. 3. Are the definitions specified in the SMPR used and applied appropriatly in the method? If no, please indicate how the terms are used. 4. Does the method, as written, contain all appropriate precautions and warnings related to the method's regaents, components, instrumentation, or method steps that may be hazardous? If no, please suggest wording or option(s). 1. Are the definitions specified in the SMPR used and applied appropriately in the supporting documentation (manuscripts, method studies, etc…)? If not, please explain the differences and if the method is impacted by the difference.
This method is able to separately determine the fatty acid esters of the cis and trans isomers of lutein and zeaxanthin in ingredients and dietary supplements. However, it cannot distinguish the esterified and nonesterified forms of these xanthophylls. In addition, this method did not document any information about beta‐cryptoxanthin.
Yes, the analytical techniques used in the method meet the SMPR requirements.
Authors used “Precision” as the term to document both “Repeatability” and “Reproducibility” procedures. Authors established “Recovery” by comparing the analytical results of commercial samples with values from suppliers’ Certificate of Analysis, while the SMPR requires comparing the analytical results from spiked sample with their theoretical value. Method's reagents, components, instrumentation, or method steps are generally safe.
III. Review of Information in Support of the Method
Yes.
Made with FlippingBook