OMA Protocol Review: OMAMAN-56 Sulfites in Shrimp

Table 3. Method developer results for incurred samples of boiled shrimp

Accuracy (meanBiofish/ meanOMA)

Day/ Analyst/ Device

Mean Result (mg/kg)

Matrix

Method

S r

RSD r

(%)

RSD i

(%)

Accuracy (%)

Bias

Day /Analyst / Device

OMA

-

-

-

-

-

Day1 /Analyst 1/ Device 1

0

0

-

-

-

-

BIOFISH 300 SUL

Day2 /Analyst2/ Device2

0

0

-

-

-

-

Day /Analyst / Device

OMA

‹10

-

-

-

-

-

Day1 /Analyst 1/ Device 1

5.59

0.36

6.44

-

-

-

BIOFISH 300 SUL

9.09

Day2 /Analyst2/ Device2

5.91

0.65

10.99

-

-

-

Day /Analyst / Device

OMA

‹10

-

-

-

-

-

Day1 /Analyst 1/ Device 1

6.79

0.45

6.63

-

-

-

BIOFISH 300 SUL

5.42

Day2 /Analyst2/ Device2

7.07

0.25

3.54

-

-

-

Day /Analyst / Device

OMA

13.33

1.5

11.25

-

-

-

Day1 /Analyst 1/ Device 1

12.87

0.75

5.83

0.97

97

-0.46

BOILED SHRIMP BIOFISH 300 SUL

7.14

Day2 /Analyst2/ Device2

12.80

1.15

8.99

0.96

96

-0.53

Day /Analyst / Device

OMA

21.67

0.6

2.77

-

-

-

Day1 /Analyst 1/ Device 1

19.09

0.60

3.14

0.88

88

-2.58

BIOFISH 300 SUL

3.63

Day2 /Analyst2/ Device2

19.65

0.78

3.97

0.91

91

-2.02

Day /Analyst / Device

OMA

31.33

0.6

1.92

-

-

-

Day1 /Analyst 1/ Device 1

31.67

1.72

5.43

1.01

101

0.34

BIOFISH 300 SUL

7.98

Day2 /Analyst2/ Device2

28.44

1.86

6.54

0.91

91

-2.89

19