RI-ERP-FINALACTION-Recommendations

AOAC RESEARCH INSTITUTE Expert Review Panel Chair Report for Dietary Starches Page 4 of 5

MEETING MINUTES

I. Welcome and Introductions The Expert Review Panel Chair, Lars Reimann welcomed Expert Review Panel members and initiated introductions. The Chair discussed with the panel the goal of the meeting. II. Review of AOAC Volunteer Policies Deborah McKenzie presented an overview of AOAC Volunteer Policies, Volunteer Acceptance Agreement and and Expert Review Panel Policies and Procedures which included Volunteer Conflicts of Interest, Policy on the Use of the Association, Name, Initials, Identifying Insignia, Letterhead, and Business Cards, Antitrust Policy Statement and Guidelines, and the Volunteer Acceptance Form (VAF). All members of the ERP were required to submit and sign the Volunteer Acceptance Form. The Expert Review panel openly discussed any potential conflicts of interest. The group approved all of the members after disclaimers were noted. III. Expert Review Panel Process Overview and Guidelines Deborah McKenzie presented an overview of the Expert Review panel process. The presentation included information regarding method submission, recruitment of ERP members, composition and vetting expertise, method assignments, meeting logistics, consensus, First Action to Final Action requirements, method modifications, publications, and documentation. IV. Review of Methods All members of the ERP presented a review and discussed the proposed collaborative study manuscript for Determination of Dietary Starch in Animal Feeds and Pet Food by an Enzymatic-Colorimetric Method. The method author, Mary Beth Hall of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, was not present to address the concerns of the ERP members. A summary of comments was provided to the ERP members. 1 MOTION: Motion by DeVries; Second by Szpylka to adopt this method for First Action Official Methods Status with the requested revisions. AOAC Research Institute ERP Use Only OMA METHOD: Line 376: Include “free from catalase activity”. EDITORIAL: Line 351: Include “the enzymes should be of a purity meeting the specifications listed in OMA methods 985.29 and 991.43 Line 366: The “amylase” should be listed as “amyloglucosidase” Line 344: Include activity definitions and assay procedures. Line 118-122: Please clarify section. The Expert Review Panel would like to know if GOPOD blank is used as instrument blank will the intercept disappear and negate the need for a quadratic standard curve?

Consensus demonstrated by: 8 in favor, 0 opposed, and 0 abstentions (Unanimous). Motion Passed.

1 Attachment 1: Summary of Expert Reviewer Comments for OMAMAN-13